Whitbread PLC valuation.

Whitbread PLC valuation.

Order Summary

Type of assignment:Coursework

Academic level:College Level

Referencing style:MLA

Number of sources:10

Subject:Finance

Client country:United Kingdom (UK English)

Assignment extract:

From the perspective of an existing investor in a small number of shares, you are required to provide a variety of possible share valuations for Whitbread plc as at the end of February 2018. Your share valuations should include the use of the following methods:
– Assets
net assets valuation
– Dividends
The dividend valuation model to infinity
The dividend growth model
– Cash flows
– P:E ratio

As explained above please make sure that you show the calculations for each method and analyze the results and use the recent financial result of Whitbread PLC

you should provide a critical evaluation of each equity valuation method used in terms of theoretical soundness and practicality.

You will need to analyze the recent financial performance of Whitbread plc in order to inform your valuations and set them in context. Your analysis should
include ratios suitable for the investor

Your detailed workings should be contained within a spreadsheet in the appendices, but there should be sufficient detail in the main report to show the assumptions that each valuation is based on.

The structure of the paper should be split into

1-Introduction

2- Net assets valuation

3-Divdnds valuation model and its other valation like Divdend growth model…ets.

4-Cash flow model

5-P:E ratio
Historic PER
Prospective PER

This assignment based on the valuation lecture so i will attach the slides and the brief of the assignment.

A variety of share valuations using at least four approaches; have these methods been
appropriately applied; are the valuations well informed; are any assumptions made realistic
/35
2) Are the calculations of cost of capital accurate and is the approach sound; has data been
used appropriately
/10
3) Critical evaluation of valuation methods; does the evaluation demonstrate understanding of
the weaknesses and strengths of the valuation methods; does the discussion recognise
practical issues in the application of the methods; is there evidence of wide reading
/20
4) Appendices; do they provide an adequate level of supporting detail; are they clearly laid
out; do they support the valuations sufficiently /10
5) Ratios; have ratios been selected and used that are suitable and relevant; have they been
adequately and appropriately interpreted; have they been used to inform the valuations
/15
6) Is the report clear and well- structured; is a list of references included; is the report
appropriately referenced; is the report within the word count

Answer preview

Word: 2,000