Research Gaps, Objectives and Questions of the Study
Project Details
Paper Topic : (Task A – Ch2 Literature Review- editing Research gap section) Style : APA Language Style : English (U.K.) Type of Assignment : Literature Review Deadline : 20 Hours Acedemic Level : Editing Rewriting Number of pages : 5 Number of Sources : 1 Order Instructions Hope you’re doing well. Please find the instructions for this short and quick Task A which is editing a section of the Ch2 – Literature Review below. I trust you will keep all the documents I provided completely confidential. Please find a complete version of a Ch2-Literature Review attached. The section I need to be edited is “2.7 Research Gaps, Objectives and Questions of the Study”. To the writer: I have provided an introduction about the research questions in the Introduction of the chapter and detail explanation in section 2.7. I need a professional writer in this area to read the whole document and re-edit the section 2.7 and make the Research Gap section more clear and understandable and express and relate clearly to the research objectives and questions. Suggestion: As you can see there are Three Dimensions of IT Governance explained in section 2.4. One approach could be to find gap in the literature in each dimension and express them in 2.4.1, 2.4.2 and 2.4.3 and have them summarised in section 2.7. The other approach (recommended) is to only have all the gaps just in section 2.7. Please do ask the writer to have the Track Changes on. This is a very small task, not more than few hours. I need tracked changes so I can see where you have made chang
Hi,
Thanks for the task. I have now the update feedback from the Advisory Committee as below. Could you please have a look and apply them. If there is any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.Please find the updated version of the document attached and apply the feedback on the latest attached document.Track Changes ON please
—Feedback—-
It is nice to see you have consolidated this material into one section.
There are some issues that need attention:
1. There seems to be a lot of repetition between the paragraphs. For example, the final 3 paragraphs on page 4 repeat the content from earlier pages. One way to avoid this is to write an outline of the section with a single sentence for each paragraph that summarises the key point in that paragraph. Each paragraph should be about one concept.
2. The research gaps in Table 1 both highlight the “lack of empirical evidence†in previous work. The conceptual study must be motivated by something other than a lack of empirical research.
So, make sure where ever you have used lack of empirical study (in the whole research gap section especially the last table) it refers to the gap which is going to be filled by Phenomenological study.
The motivation for the conceptual study should be “lack of theoretical knowledge” and you should say something like there were not enough or comprehensive enough theoretical reasoning why and how EITG leads to Business value from organizational perspective.
You can add a third gap in the last table as well for conceptual study, e.g.,
a) Lack of theoretical framework and knowledge on developing a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of why-how effective IT governance leads to business value from IT investments using the three dimensions of Content, Actor and Process
b) Lack of empirical evidence on developing a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of why-how effective IT governance leads to business value from individual’s perspective involved in IT governance arrangements
This needs to be reflected in the last table as well as throughout the Research Gap section.
3. The long paragraph that extends from the bottom of page 3 to the tops of page 4 highlights how you will answer the research questions/gpas in knowledge (from the sentence “Therefore, considering all …” )– I think this is what you have in the following chapter (research methods chapter). It means, in the “Research Gap” section, there is no need to say much about how we fill the knowledge gap. Please change the wording a little bit and focus more on highlighting what the gaps are.
4. So in general, I think the logic flow in the section needs clarification, and there needs to be a gap in knowledge that the conceptual study will fill.
—-Feedback—-
Track Changes ON please
Could you please let me know when this will be ready?
Thanks again for the help.
Hi,
Thanks for the task. I have now the update feedback from the Advisory Committee as below. Could you please have a look and apply them. If there is any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.Please find the updated version of the document attached and apply the feedback on the latest attached document. Please be thorough in your revisionTrack Changes ON please
—Feedback—-
It is nice to see you have consolidated this material into one section.
There are some issues that need attention:
1. There seems to be a lot of repetition between the paragraphs. For example, the final 3 paragraphs on page 4 repeat the content from earlier pages. One way to avoid this is to write an outline of the section with a single sentence for each paragraph that summarises the key point in that paragraph. Each paragraph should be about one concept.
2. The research gaps in Table 1 both highlight the “lack of empirical evidence†in previous work. The conceptual study must be motivated by something other than a lack of empirical research.
So, make sure where ever you have used lack of empirical study (in the whole research gap section especially the last table) it refers to the gap which is going to be filled by Phenomenological study.
The motivation for the conceptual study should be “lack of theoretical knowledge” and you should say something like there were not enough or comprehensive enough theoretical reasoning why and how EITG leads to Business value from organizational perspective.
You can add a third gap in the last table as well for conceptual study, e.g.,
a) Lack of theoretical framework and knowledge on developing a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of why-how effective IT governance leads to business value from IT investments using the three dimensions of Content, Actor and Process
b) Lack of empirical evidence on developing a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of why-how effective IT governance leads to business value from individual’s perspective involved in IT governance arrangements
This needs to be reflected in the last table as well as throughout the Research Gap section.
3. The long paragraph that extends from the bottom of page 3 to the tops of page 4 highlights how you will answer the research questions/gpas in knowledge (from the sentence “Therefore, considering all …” )– I think this is what you have in the following chapter (research methods chapter). It means, in the “Research Gap” section, there is no need to say much about how we fill the knowledge gap. Please change the wording a little bit and focus more on highlighting what the gaps are.
4. So in general, I think the logic flow in the section needs clarification, and there needs to be a gap in knowledge that the conceptual study will fill.
—-Feedback—-
