Discuss whether life is meaningful or meaningless

In this paper, you will argue that you would, or would not, want to live forever. In doing so,
discuss Susan Wolf’s analysis of the meaning of life and Thomas Nagel’s view on death.
For many of you, this is your first philosophy class. To give direction to your writing, this
paper will be highly structured. I’ll give you the outline of a great philosophy paper, and
you fill it in with content. Assume that your reader knows nothing about philosophy. Write
in a way that would make sense to a friend or roommate.
1. In the first paragraph, introduce the issue and state your thesis, all in four
sentences or less. Space is limited, so you’ll have to get to the point quickly!
2. In the second paragraph, describe Wolf’s view on the meaning of life. Be sure to
explain what she means by the meaning of life, where she believes meaning
comes from, and why she holds this view.
3. In the third paragraph, give Nagel’s argument for why death is bad. In doing so,
explain his position and his reasons for believing it.
4. In the fourth paragraph, argue that you would, or would not, want to live forever.
In your argument, explicitly consider the implications of Wolf and Nagel’s views.
5. In the fifth paragraph, provide a brief conclusion.
In making your arguments, it will be useful to refer to lecture notes, online slides, “The
Meaning of Lives” by Susan Wolf, and “Death” by Thomas Nagel.

Answer preview:

Words: 925