Briefly summarise your argument about Nokia that they do not act responsible

Briefly summarise your argument about Nokia that they do not act responsible, identify the strong and weak elements of it, and recommend ways that you could improve it. In your report discuss;To what extent the organisation is operating responsibly; and  recommend ways that it can improve its contribution to sustainable development and resit Task Part 2: Write a critique of your own digital presentation. Further information and guidance
Part 1
 Make sure you introduce the business and explain what sustainability/ responsibility mean.
 You can focus on particular elements of a business (you do not need to cover everything that the business does).
 Include theories about responsibility and sustainability. Explain what these mean and reference them.
 Use evidence about the business taken from a range of sources and relate this to the theories introduced. Reference the evidence that you use.
 Include evidence from a range of sources.
 In evaluating the business you can reach positive or negative conclusions (as long as they are justified).
 Show awareness of possible critiques of your argument.
 If you are introducing a lot of evidence supporting a positive argument, is there evidence that might challenge this (or vice versa)?
Part 2
 Briefly summarise your presentation, identifying the question you answered, and highlighting the evidence and theory used.
 Identify the aspects of the presentation that were strong and those that were weaker. Inorder to do this refer back to the marking criteria.
 Identify ways that your presentation could be improved, for example, what other evidence could you include (and from what sources), what theory could you use and how?